Oct 19, 2005

Wikipedia, caveat emptor

Blogger, TOCQUEVILLE, makes a good point about WIKIPEDIA. Some threateningly disagree.

Caveat emptor.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Quote:

I have been stunned to discover that the article was always unsatisfactory, prejudiced, irrelevant or simply wrong from first to last sentence.

Couldn’t the very same thing be said about position papers from the USCCB?

6:20 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mahony's coveted list:

Wicked-pedo-pedia.

8:13 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Site Meter